I spotted this sticker last night and found it quite interesting. Posting stickers is just about as immediate a medium as blogging. You can grab a stack of blanks and scribble away with your marker. Walk outside, peel, stick.
I saw two of these on Broad St on the SE corner of Spruce St.
Tulin has a poll to vote on whether or not the Philadelphia Inquirer should have or should not have published the editorial cartoon of the prophet Mohammad. I think that here in the U.S., the press should be providing coverage of a news story. If that news story is on a drawing, we need to see that drawing.
If the drawing was of something blatantly offensive to Koreans, I'd want to see it. I'd make my own assessment of the drawing. But that's me and that hypothetical is not about religion, a highly volatile subject. Either way, I don't see rioting as a solution. I've never understood using religion as a starting point for violence.
Attytood points to an editorial by the Inquirer's Daily News' award-winning cartoonist Signe Wilkinson:
I’m guessing the Danish cartoonists were trying to do the same thing. The cartoons were criticizing violence and suicide bombing in the name of Islam. The cartoonists have the right to publish. And, in a free society, Muslims have a right to protest and publish their own cartoons in response. This is not a right granted to cartoonists or protesters in some Muslim countries.It's a good read.
DuctapeFatwa has a good diary up on Booman Tribune about this.