A Smoke-Filled Room
Above Average Jane
All Spin Zone
America's Hometown
Apartment 2024
Attytood
Ballad of Yoko
Blankbaby
Blinq
Booman Tribune
Corrente
Digby
Disabilities Studies, Temple U
Eschaton
Fact-esque, A Reality-Based Blog
Garnet Donkey
iFlipFlop
Jenny Rat Knees
Long Cut
Marc Stier at Large
Mere Cat
Metroblog Philadelphia
The (mis)Adventures of Anonymous City Girl
My Direct Democracy
paradox1x
Pesky'Apostrophe
Philadelphia Restaurants
Philadelphia Will Do
Philly IMC
Politics Philly
Rittenhouse Review
Rowhouse Logic
Sarcasmo's Corner
She Flies With Her Own Wings
Skaroff Blog
Slow Gardening
The Smedley Log
Suburban Guerrilla
Up Yer Noz
Trace2000
Whiskey Bar
Young Philly Politics
« What a Game | Main | Bumrunner Photos »
The comments to this entry are closed.
It's scary how eminent domain can be used to line the pockets of the developers at the expense of the private landowners. Used to be that the government could only force sales if there were roads or highways being built. Now, the Supreme Court has allowed tax base increase and economic considerations to determine if the government can take the land for the developers. In the case of Rindelaub's Row, 10 Rittenhouse won, and I think that the condo will be a good thing on the Square. In general, though, I deplore when the developers win out over the people. Not in this case, but in others, it's almost always a question of the developers greasing the pockets of the politicians, and it's sad.
Surprisingly, it was the more liberal Supreme Court judges who supported the new relaxed eminent domain criteria and the conservative judges who dissented and supported private ownership. Not playing any blame game here -- just an interesting observation.
John Featherman
Republican Candidate, US Senate-PA
www.featherman.com
Posted by: John Featherman | January 16, 2006 at 09:58 PM
These are great shots, though-- thanks for taking these and documenting the demolition.
Posted by: yoko | January 17, 2006 at 10:54 AM