Sometime in the next six to twelve months, I will purchase either a big piece of glass or a new body. Either would be a very large purchase. I'd like to have the equipment I currently have fully paid for by the time I go plunge money in on new toys equipment.
The 12-24mm f/4G would be a nice addition and basically round out my glass coverage [12-24, 18-70, 50, 80-200]. The camera bag would be quite full at that point. It would allow me to take very wide interior shots like restaurants/bars/clubs [for my AOL freelancing] and other tight situations where simply backing up isn't an option. It's the favorite lens by many photographers I admire, used as their 'walk around lens' for everyday stuff instead of a mid-range zoom [which I use for the most part]. I'm not sure if I'd do the same, I've never had that wide a view before so I couldn't say if it would be on my camera the most. But it wouldn't just be a toy [like an über cool 10.5 fisheye would] that I just wanted because I wanted it, I'd get actual use out of it. It would pay for itself whereas I think the fisheye would just be a hit for me.
The D200 is fucking awesome, it seems. I've read a few hands on reviews and on paper, it's got everything and a bag of chips, and a gigantic viewfinder as well. No 1/500 flash though, it tops out at 1/250 for fill flash. I've only used fill flash up to 1/180 that I can recall, but hey, ya never know and I've only been utilizing daytime fill flash for a few months now, it fucking rocks. It has a more robust AF motor which means quicker AF focussing in harder and in low-light situations. The larger viewfinder is something I'd very much like, simply easier to see that way. A dedicated AF-S/C switch instead of fumbling through menu options. Mirror lock-up for long exposures is a plus taking care of the slap of the mirror at the beginning of the frame. And the nice Quality/ISO/White Balance buttons on the top right freeing up room on the back panel for larger buttons. ISO in the viewfinder! I forget to double/triple/quadruple check to make sure that I didn't leave the ISO on say, 1600, before going out shooting the next day [ARG!]. The image size/quality setting is a plus too, you can now dictate how files are created, with an image size priortiy [all the files are basically the same size] or image quality priority [files get larger with more complicated scenes]; it makes perfect sense to me to pick the quality priority setting. And the vertical/portrait extra battery grip, not an option for the D70. I haven't missed not having one, but the option to have one is nice and I think I'd use it.
Yes, the body is almost twice the cost of the glass, but once price gets close to $1K, it's basically the same to my wallet = FUCKING EXPENSIVE.
The thought of having a two camera setup, a D200 with the 80-200mm f/2.8 and a D70 with the 12-24mm f/4 or vice versa, mmmmmm. A D200 and the 12-24mm f/4 would perfectly fill my camera bag.
And if a wealthy philanthropist, say George Soros, happens upon this post and feels like throwing some loot around, I got a whole wishlist you can have at!
***UPDATE*** 12.29
Maybe I should just grab the cheaper and very much raved about Tokina AF 12-24mm f/4 AT-X DX sooner than later and wait and get the sweet sweet D200 if/when it comes down a few hunny.